Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62
And as far as my silly initial post, yeah I got carried away dismissing the Cali product based upon the Sh*it preps they have given us this year... My Bad.
|
Why don't you simply clarify what you mean instead of the jackass macho head games? A couple of the CA Derby preps were apparently Sh!t because they had small fields. I guess this means they were unbettable (never mind that Out Of Bounds paid out at 10-1 and Drill nearly 4-1).
However, they certainly were relevant and will continue to be so, because they will invariably feature top class prospects.
Quote:
|
But what about you defending the product by going back to Giacamo? Beyond Silly.
|
Giacomo was what, 6 years ago? Talk about a fair weather fan. And, once again, I was not "defending the product". I was simply pointing out all the CA-based horses in the last decade (I know, I know, that's ancient history) that were, in fact, "relevant" on the Derby trail.
Quote:
|
You produced that list pretty fast, you an insider out there?
|
I produced the list quickly because I follow horse racing. Do you?