Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
I'm not defending Foley. I am just pointing out the hypocrisy. Like I said, it's funny how one day you say that you believe in the concept of innocent until proven guilty, but then when a republican is accused of something, you say consider them guilty immediately. You say that Foley paid this guy $100k in hush money as if this has been proven in a court of law. Yet when the police have mountains of evidence against Kieran Fallon, you say that you think he is innocent because you believe in the concept of innocent until proven guitly. What am I missing? Why would you say that Foley paid a guy $100k in hush money before it has been proven?
|
Rupert,
I'll give you that. He's totally innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
That's the American way.
This comes from someone that can be locked up as an "enemy combatant" if decreed so by the law that was signed this week by our beloved president.
Will I be locked up while awaiting trial?
Heck, I haven't even left the country.
So, am I innocent until I can prove so? Or is there a burden of proof to find my guilt?
We live in a topsie turvey world, up is down, truth is a lie, the media is to blame for the actions of leaders, and parents are to blame for the im's of a pedophile.
Who'd a thunk it?
Orwell?