Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
What did the article say? It did not say that the CIA concluded that the meeting betwen Atta and Iraqi agents did not take place. It said that the report cast doubts about the meeting. There is a big difference.
The same thing can be said for everyting else in the article. There was nothing in there that specicfically contradicted anything that Bush or Cheney said. Juts because it said that Hussein generally viewed extremists as a threat, that does not mean that he never aided extremists.
I can't tell you that I know for a fact that Bush never said anything that he knew wasn't true, but as of right now I haven't seen anything that would lead me to believe that Bush purposefully lied. He basically did the same thing that you have been doing throughout this thread. He simply believed what he wanted to believe. He gladly accepted evidence that supported what he believed, yet ignored evidence that contradicted what he believed.
|
And you have been Mr openminded? Please.
If you dont believe reports from your own CIA, then what do you believe? And how can you in one breath use CIA information as ammunition and then ignore it when it doesnt suit your needs?
It was obvious deception an anyone with a brain knows it.