Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brianwspencer
No, it's just that all of this smacks of intellectual dishonesty. The problem with Chuck is that it's all "We care about spending money, we're fiscally conservative....unless it's our guy. We care about transparency....unless it's our guy."
We'll see if "our" boy turns out to be a disaster. The guy before has already been spoken for as an overwhelming disaster, at least Obama still has time to salvage the ship.
Me, like I've said all along, I'll continue to wait and see how things turn out and take responsibility for my vote then, and it should be easy, considering the wildly unmitigated obvious disaster you all claim we're heading into. Time will tell.
At least I'm consistent. I make no qualms about how liberal I'd like him to be and what I'd like to see happen. I don't pretend I give a $hit about money and about morals etc, when your guy is President but then stop when my guy's President. It's not my consistency that's up for debate here.
|
I DIDNT AGREE WITH A LOT OF BUSH'S FISCAL POLICY. I HATE SARBANNES-OXLEY. I AM PISSED THAT BUSH SPENT SO MUCH. I AM PISSED THAT BUSH DIDNT TAKE THE GLOVES OFF THE TROOPS AND GET THAT MESS OVER WITH A WHOLE LOT FASTER AND GIVE THZE IRANIANS SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.
There is that enough?