Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ELA
What do I mean -- what I mean is that it has nothing to do with DWL. There are plenty of companies that will insure his horses -- period. The issue is that I said a claim was made that said "ALL" and you commented on it by saying "SOME" -- I didn't see you responde to that. Obviously, if companies will insure his horses than it has nothing to do with DWL.
I would also look to have a company decline coverage, put in writing that they are declining coverage because the horse is trained by DWL. We've all heard the so called "claims" that he has higher %'s of breakdowns -- yeah, more "claims". Proof would be nice. Also, what kind of BS insurance are we talking about here. Breakdowns? How about mortality.
Like I said, nonsense and BS. Let's all get together and call insurance companies -- not brokers -- and we can come back here and celebrate that DWL can't get insurance from ALL insurance companies.
Carry on.
Eric
|
I can't say "all" because I obviously don't know the practices of every single company out there.
In terms of "proof", the insurance companies have proof. They keep track of that type of stuff. If you don't want to believe it that is fine with me. You are the same guy that didn't believe that racing boards will check phone records and bank accounts to make sure that suspended trainers aren't still getting paid while they are suspended and aren't still having contact with the barn.