Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
You are being too much of a results queen....
Curlin was a very lightly raced horse - who happened to have some genuine no doubt about it bad luck when the spotlight was on.
I know you and I disagreed about his race in the Belmont way back when - but it would be very hard for you to knock his other three races - because he had brutal circumstances in each.
This whole 'Let's just focus on the final results of 4 races' way of thinking is also pretty silly.
Secretariat lost the Champagne, Wood Memorial, Whitney, and Woodward stakes. Easy Goer won each of those four races in ultra impressive fashion. That doesn't mean anything does it?
|
Results matter. I fail to see the 'brutal" circumstances he had in the Belmont and Haskell. He was not a dominant 3 year old, he just wasnt. Secretariat was. Even Point Given was. Curlin wasn't.