Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Exactly. Based on accomplishments you would have to give it to WC, but Rags to Riches is the greater talent of the two. The Belmont Stakes proved it. Rags could get any distance, and was improving. WC obviously had distance limitations.
|
Uh, that's not exactly what I said or meant.
If you could put both of them as 3yos in a race, I have little doubt WC would beat Rags pretty handily. Talent wise, I'd go with WC.
What I was trying to say is that I don't think we saw the full measure of how good Rags actually is/was. Whether or not she would continue to develop until she was better than WC, I can't say really. My guess is not, but I could have seen it happening before all the nonsense started happening with her.