Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Big difference between the the BC scandal and this. Wagering security is important, that I understand. But I am at a racetrack every day and I talk to people in different jurisdictions daily and I cant remember the last time I heard about betting after the race went off. What would concern me more is a hacker getting into the system without anyone knowing. If you want to say that this instance was an example of a faulty system then I can agree with you. But if this had happened to this guy before why didn't he give other examples? Or did he and they weren't reported?
|
-from the article Maloney was hanging out by the teller , the race started and the machine didn't beep to indicate wagering was closed.
Sounds like he was at least aware of what to look for.
Fair Grounds states that their stop-wagering mechanism "malfunctioned". For that race only. - So
if the problem was centralized in FG and not in KEE = than Maloney may not have been the only past-post money. And any persuasive player matched with a crooked/gullible teller could have bet late or cancelled late for this race.
Also it wouldn't be incredibly far fetched, to raise some possibilities that the FG stop-wagering mechanism was at previous times a bit tardy...