Quote:
|
Originally Posted by philcski
They went 46 1/5 to the half. That is NOT favorable to frontrunners at a mile and a quarter.
The rest of the pace was beaten 37, 45, and 52 lengths. 'Nuff said.
|
I mentioned the early pace was fast in my original post; should have referenced that to the 1/2 mile time. But it was not brutal, such as 45+ would be. And that is why I asked him if he looked at pace differently that I.
Is the 1/2 mile time more important than the 3/4? Or vice versa? Or they both are? How do you look at this? That is why I asked it the way I did. Still not getting much of a response on this.