Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Negative Key Race (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22585)

ceejay 05-19-2008 01:59 PM

Negative Key Race
 
Is the Arkie Derby turning out to be a negative key race this year? http://www.drf.com/row/charts/08OPar...erby_chart.pdf

the_fat_man 05-19-2008 02:05 PM

I mean, who might I have wanted out of this race for a representative G1?

SniperSB23 05-19-2008 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceejay
Is the Arkie Derby turning out to be a negative key race this year? http://www.drf.com/row/charts/08OPar...erby_chart.pdf

The figure was about five lengths too high on every set of figures. Just look at the figures for every horse going in, what they got in that race, and then their subsequent performance. It is pretty clear where the outlier is. Most people on here thought that figure was a mistake right after they announced it.

Bobby Fischer 05-19-2008 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The figure was about five lengths too high on every set of figures. Just look at the figures for every horse going in, what they got in that race, and then their subsequent performance. It is pretty clear where the outlier is. Most people on here thought that figure was a mistake right after they announced it.

Agreed. Clearly this cast was lacking a star.

Sometimes just watching the race can trump a speed figure in a case like this.
It doesn't make logical sense that this performance would be scored higher than any of BB's races or races like the Peter Pan. It was more on par with a race like the Tesio at Pimlico.

They actually made a nice race out of it. From a fan's standpoint, I enjoyed the battle. The top 2 can probably run some more good races @ G3 or ungraded stakes level at the proper distance.

ateamstupid 05-19-2008 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The figure was about five lengths too high on every set of figures. Just look at the figures for every horse going in, what they got in that race, and then their subsequent performance. It is pretty clear where the outlier is. Most people on here thought that figure was a mistake right after they announced it.

Yeah, it was pretty obvious. Any time the first four finishers in a race all run career tops, it's probably a good idea to question the figure.

SniperSB23 05-19-2008 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Yeah, it was pretty obvious. Any time the first four finishers in a race all run career tops, I tend to question the figure.

To top it off I got fooled by figures for the also rans that showed up in the Lone Star Derby where they totally tanked. For the Preakness and from now on I'm dropping five lengths off that figure for any horse from that race before I start my handicapping.

ateamstupid 05-19-2008 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
To top it off I got fooled by figures for the also rans that showed up in the Lone Star Derby where they totally tanked. For the Preakness and from now on I'm dropping five lengths off that figure for any horse from that race before I start my handicapping.

Me too. I'm also dropping seven points or so off of the Lexington figure.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.