Winning the Cotillion and Distaff would make her generational?

I've heard it all now.

I said G consideration.

Yeah that's ridiculous.

I'm not sure she's a good as Swiss Skydiver who actually won the Preakness, was 2nd in the Bluegrass, won the Alabama, etc. and no one thought she was generational.

It's okay to just admit you wildly overestimated her talent because she ran at the track you announce at.

SHE WON THE KENTUCKY OAKS

That's a wild overestimation?

There were quite a few 3yo fillies who won the 1st allowance condition.

There was only one I speculated might be a superstar.

There was only one that won the Oaks.

The last time I did that was when Zenyatta won the 1st allowance condition.

Seems like a decent track record to me.

Ending sentences with prepositions now ? The nuns would be horrified.

Yes calling her a generational talent is a wild overestimation.

You posted for days before the Oaks...with no pre race opinion on the supposed generational talent. After the race here you were with your look at me nonsense.

Nothing before the Preakness. Here we are again.

You can never be wrong, nor never admit you're wrong.

I said on my show with Nancy Holthus she could be a "superstar" after the allowance race.

Many people heard me say it.

Today I said if she were to win the Cotillion and Distaff which would produce an Eclipse award " G consideration" would still be in play.

I've admitted a hundred times over the years that I was wrong about many things.

You on the other hand have NEVER acknowledged the times I've been right because HATE always takes precedence.

When you step on a scale is the first number a 3 or 4?

Your last sentence speaks volumes Vic.

You want me to acknowledge you so bad. You want me to like you so bad.

It's hilarious.

You should quit now. Last time we did this you deleted almost all of your posts, remember?

I don't care if you acknowledge me.

Never have. Never will.

What I want is to contribute to the Forum and NEVER EVER hear from you again.

That's the truth.

Who cares what you want?

I care.

And legions of people who avoid this site like the plague for one reason.

They don't want to deal with all the HATE you spew at EVERYONE.

Isn't worth it to real fans that just want to enjoy our sport.

If you were to go away. There would be an immediate influx of at least a hundred posters who were afraid of being treated so horribly by you.

I have times when I'm away for months. You simply find others to berate and belittle.

NOBODY WANTS TO DEAL WITH YOU.

Horseracing is fun. You take that aspect away in this forum.

Hope you're happy.

That post has NOTHING to do with me.

And SUPER NOTHING to do with horseracing.

There's ZERO defense for this kind of personal vitriol on a horse racing site.

You should be ashamed.

Just terrible. Sad.

I have to quote this for when you delete it.

In case you haven't noticed Vic, for the most part people here are laughing at you. People are mocking you. You have to see that, right?

You've been making posts like this towards me for YEARS. Get the hint. No one cares what you think.

Does Oaklawn know about your online behavior? If they did, do you think they'd be proud?

Actually it’s number 2, just like what you are a piece of

Everyone hates you too Dan.

No amount of ass kissing will ever change that.

You couldn’t find 3 people that hate me . You, on the other hand are universally disliked.

Does your brother know what a complete bitch you’ve turned into? Is he ashamed?

If Dan the fat vagina and Vic stopped posting would anyone with an IQ above 76 care?