![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Like the part where NT continues to point out that the fact that Zanjero "almost" won a Grade I does not mean that having bet Zanjero to win a Grade I was any more a good decision than had he never come within 10 lengths of doing so? Seriously, thank God you're here to ensure we meet that 10% threshold of people who understand things like nuance, right? And I was actually starting to feel like the excessive amoun of crap you catch was unfair....and you just reminded me why it keeps happening. Figures. |
And here I thought DT.com wasn't Justin's first rodeo.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Having made this bet, you should know as well as anyone, however, that those two categories are not mutually exclusive. |
|
Quote:
|
Please just stop.....
|
Quote:
I only look for arguments in the politics section buddy. And I'm happy you think I have no sense of humor! Are you sure you are the real Justin Dew by the way? |
Quote:
And wrong. But I've been mostly focusing on the stupid part. The fact that your otherwise personal bet is out there for discussion is really swell, so we can all take a moment and say thanks for that and move along, but this whole portion of the conversation started with my calling that bet sheer lunacy. And since the conversation started, the fact that it was sheer lunacy has failed to change, so I (along with just about everybody else, probably) have little idea what you're going for at this point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I respect your opinion. I just can't understand why you have it. |
Quote:
I forgive you for that failing. |
Quote:
How the fucl< did I get personal with you by quoting what you said on another thread and pointing out how wrong you were. I didnt know it was a joke and apparantly 90% of people on here who are not on your level didnt know it was a joke. Now I'm looking for a fight. |
Here's how....
Quote:
|
![]() |
I wish there was a middle finger emoticon.
I'm out. |
![]() |
[quote=GenuineRisk]I don't know if there is, but sometime around Rags' Belmont I read a really interesting article about the physiological advantages of colts vs. fillies. I wish I could remember where I saw it and post the link, but I remember the thrust of the article being that there was no real advantage for colts at short distances (six furlongs and less) and at long ones (past a mile and a quarter) but that the males had an advantage for the middle distances, with the advantage peaking at a mile and a quarter.
I looked for the article, but no luck so far. However, I did find this, ahem, very "interesting" look at Rags' Belmont victory from a Biblical standpoint. http://www.biblenews1.com/history7/20070609filly.htm This is better than most explanations that have been trying to explain Mine That Bird's victory. Is the infamous ROSSTABBERT behind this organization? |
I cant wait to see him try to explain his post to andy in the Derby re cap thread.
Good King Solomon will solve it. Biblical stuff, the final word, cant wait. |
Please mommy make them stop............................. :zz: :wf
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.