Derby Trail Forums - Remember This Statement By Crist

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)

- Triple Crown Topics/Archive.. (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)

- - Remember This Statement By Crist (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20799)

scuds we all get it..you love yankee bravo hate solis and are phuckig nuts

thats it close this thread,, please

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

scuds we all get it..you love yankee bravo hate solis and are phuckig nuts

And all who don't love Yankee Bravo, don't think jocks matter that much, and still have a morsel of sanity left are the bad guys.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

scuds we all get it..you love yankee bravo hate solis and are phuckig nuts

thats it close this thread,, please

Well,Hooves,People want to know why I say he rides crappy.I was just getting around to answering him.Lot of people said stuff,and wanted to know why I think stuff etc. So,I will answer them.They can delete the thread anytime they want.I wouldn't say I love Yankee Bravo.As you can see,I was looking for 100-1 on him.I can't love the chances of a derby horse with SOLIS on,but he is a derby contender.Crist,Drugs,the Andy Chalk etc. have all had to make their opinion known that they think he isn't a derby contender.They have taken a negative opinion on a horse.I don't agree.That's all.They are just used to running people over,and so they take great offense when somebody asks them to show evidence supporting their opinion.They can't show that evidence.He has run well in all 4 races over 4 different surfaces.3 wins and a 3rd.Show me how they can say the horse isn't a legit contender? All I am saying is they can't rule him out as a contender(not with the evidence so far,and just 4 races.)I am not the extreme opinion here.Their's is extreme.All they say is he stinks,or to like him is ridiculous.That's not evidence. It's just rhetoric.It's a long thread,but nobody has said anything to support the opinion that the horse isn't a legit derby contender.I've given plenty of reasons why he is a legit derby contender.They have not supported their opinion at all.They just try to act superior when they say their opinion,and hope nobody notices they've said nothing to back up their opinion.So,you can try to get rid of the thread,but until they support their opinion,I don't think the thread is complete.

Did the space bar do something to offend you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

And all who don't love Yankee Bravo, don't think jocks matter that much, and still have a morsel of sanity left are the bad guys.

Cue violins.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

^^^Trying way too hard.

^^^ Should show gratitude. Would still be two-fisted betting firsters on the Big A Inner if not for me.^^^

DaHoss: "Sent To Stud, I disagree about not betting first time starters on the Aqu Inner. Sometimes they are good value."

Yeah, when they win 3% of the races, sure.

That's ok, Jay. We're here to help.

Yawn.

Watchmaker:

Quote:

But aside from Pyro winning convincingly again, there were a few positives to take from his performance. As trainer Steve Asmussen noted after the race, Pyro was into the game early, racing in easy striking distance. When a closer like Pyro is not at the mercy of the pace, he is a much more dangerous performer. And Pyro made a couple of moves Saturday, an asset that can often be helpful in oversized fields like the Kentucky Derby.

Those are nice plusses, for sure. But they're not enough for me to think that it still isn't Pyro looking up at War Pass, who defeated him all three times they met last year, instead of the other way around

http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do?NID=92857

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceejay

Watchmaker:

http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do?NID=92857

watchmaker =tool..

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

watchmaker =tool..

DATS A NO-NO AROUND HERE HOOVES.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

DATS A NO-NO AROUND HERE HOOVES.

No it's not... ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus

Like you, I'm all about the evidence.

How do his turf and synthetic performances matter when analyzing his chances for the Derby, run on dirt?

Can you answer this question without having your thread b-tch STS answer it for you?

LOL. I won't answer (don't want to be a bitch, son plus I already skooled you on that) but I will say you should continue be careful and never consider the thoughts of people who bet real money and do not especially care to limit their thoughts to only the two Derby favorites 7 weeks out.

If you are not careful, you will jeopordize your opinion rating. Safer to stay in the box.

As an aside, who you calling bitch, bitch?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus

What he is saying is that it is his opinion that the surface really doesn't matter, that he has run well over 4 different surfaces.

someone please put this thread out of its misery.