![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jaipur in 1962: owner George D. Widnener didn't nominate for the Derby, preferred to try to win more prestigious Belmont instead. Jaipur won Withers (then run on the same day as the Derby), came back 2 weeks later to try the Preakness (1st attempt at 2 turns) and finished way out of the money. He won the Jersey Derby on Memorial Day (on a disqualification) and then won the Belmont.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's too bad Albertrani can't put a gun to some trainers heads and make them enter against Bernardini, some people need drastic validation I guess. |
Quote:
He's not Pegasus. He's lost before and I'm sure he'll get beat again at some point in his career. I never said he wasn't a special horse... I'm just not willing to compare him to some of the all time greats just yet. He's never been challenged and I'm interested in seeing how he handles himself once he is (if he ever is :D .) |
Quote:
|
In 1997, A.P. Indy's brilliant son Pulpit was wowing fans from January through April; he was the favorite for the Derby that year. Having never run as a two-year-old, he was being rushed to the big day. He ran a gallant fourth, suffering a career-ending injury. I think Tom Albertrani and Sheikh Maktoum remembered Pulpit as they mapped out Bernardini's campaign.
|
Quote:
|
Not "the man", the woman.
|
Quote:
Moderators should be moderate ... and understand that everyone here is an adult ... all of whom should be capable of dealing with whatever pixels may appear on their monitors. "Bans" ... if they are to exist at all ... should be based on a specific set of rules ... clearly enunciated and understood by all ... not on the personal whims of a muscle-flexing "moderator." Football can't be played with moving goalposts ... and members of this forum shouldn't have to fear arbitrary expulsion based on the on-the-fly impulses of a sole arbitor. My take: Short of persistent vulgarity and physical threats ... I don't believe anyone should be "banned" ... and certainly not for using the word "imbecile" and objecting to its deletion. Far worse things are posted on nearly every thread. As such ... I strongly disagree with the ban on Dixie. It's your spaldeen ... and you can determine who plays with it ... but an atmosphere of interference and intimidation makes the entire concept much less palatable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nice to see you back ... keep on posting. |
Quote:
|
Hell have to run a career best to hit the board. He can forget about winning
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jesustapdancingchrist. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nor is Invasor Dylan Thomas. Where did they get that goat? They should give him a long rest and point him towards the Fairplex 2007 meet.
|
Quote:
Thats a little bit steep wouldn't you say? |
I would still find it hard to call a horse great based on the 1 race. But then I have a problem with the whole Breeders Cup concept.
I would rather see him race as a 4 year old; maybe even take a few defeats, but it would depend on how he raced in those defeats. Seattle Slew completed his Triple Crown undefeated. But what he did as a 4 year old is what I really remember. He faced the best: won 2 and lost 2. |
I was kidding. Maybe Calder is a better fit for him. The turf course is lush and green. He needed binocs to see Bernardinis fat ass.
|
Quote:
Dixie wasn't benched because of the use of the word imbecile.. He got it for rude and belligerent responses to the editing of the post that included the word imbecille (as directed at a poster as opposed to an opinion)... I agree with the basic premise that being sent to the penalty box here needs to have solid and defined parameters. Those parameters are that of propriety and civility as determined by Joey, Bethani and myself. Not by whim or capriciousness... Your objection, and undoubted exception, are noted and appreciated. Only one person has been "banned" from Derby Trail, and only 2 have received benchings. Many others have been asked to utilize better judgement in their responses to confrontational situations. I believe that the vast majority of Derby Trailers are comfortable with the way in which the moderators are conducting the administration of the Forum, and invite further comment on the topic by community members. Steve |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That forum ... by the way ... collapsed because of that ... ... and a few of the same harridans are now much more demure members of this one. And as far as Dixie goes ... I think moderators should have much thicker skins ... and much more forbearance ... than was on display in that little brouhaha. Onward and upward ... |
Quote:
This thread makes pretty cool reading as far as reflecting back on what we were all thinking 4 weeks ago before the cup. |
I forgive them for they are young and know not what they do.
Been thru this so many times before with other horses... Pope Pgardn III |
Quote:
I wonder who the salty little girl is now, sorry couldn't resist... |
Quote:
|
I detract my post.
No sense in fighting with hurt egos. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Doesn't take much on a day like today... AHHH!!! :eek: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will admit that some of the posts made regarding Bernie before the classic were quite comical, but I'm more impressed with this colt after his loss than I was before. That's so typical of me... Oh well... he's on to make little baby Bernie's. :D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.