![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You must think he's going to do a lot of improving between now and the Breeders' Cup. Blame has run a number of races that are better than Lookin at Lucky's best. NT |
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is false, Blame has run 1 race that is better then Luckys best. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
Do you know anyone who suggested the dream thread? |
Quote:
ha ha ha You should get your ass over to PA and do some damage control with Mike the Eunuch, Da Hoss, CJ, and the rest of the numbers crew. |
Quote:
I am sure CJ or someone can justify it, but there is no way that Blame's performance was 8 pts better than the Foster. The track was definitely slow today considering how slow the raw velocity numbers were, but I can't believe it was that slow. Blame basically ran the same race as the Foster where he closed into a slow pace to wear down a loose leader. I figured the number would be closer to 103 which would pair Blame up with the Foster and pair QR up with the Hal's Hope. I don't buy that today was 5 lengths better. |
Someone should put a suicide watch at paceadvantage, in particular the owner.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have said that exact same thing to you many times before.... |
Those fractions with that trip there is no reason QR should lose. He's off form or not right or more or a less a miler with an amazing track affinity for GP which allows him to run longer....Don't get me wrong his Gold Cup was good, but he gives me serious pause going longer than a mile.
|
He's not the next Secretariat, but Mustket Man is pretty cool... 13-for-13 on the board in races from six furlongs to 1 1/4 miles including the Ky. Derby and the Met Mile. Not bad.
|
Quote:
But you all put a lot of effort into it, nonetheless. Keep up the good work.:rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.