![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One of the biggest myths in sports is that small market NBA teams cant compete. The Bulls havent won a championship since 1998. The Knicks since 1973. The LA Clippers never even make the playoffs. The Nets have never won a NBA championship and made the finals twice since the merger in 1976. Houston hasn't been in the finals in 16 years. The 76'ers have been in the finals 1 time since 1983. The Washington metor area is the 7th most populated in the US but when have the Wizards been relevant? Since the begining of the supposed heyday of the NBA, 1980 these teams have won chapionships-Lakers 10 times, Boston 4 times, Philadelphia 1 time, Detroit 3 times, Houston 2 times, San Antonio 4 times, the Bulls 6 times, Miami 1 time and Dallas 1 time. 32 years only 9 teams and 3 of them once. That means that 20 teams including 2 NY teams, 1 LA team and teams from Washington, Phoenix, Atlanta and San Fran bay area have zero championship. Why did the Lakers and Boston and SA win multiple championships? Better management. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the NBA wont let NO operate like a normal team they should disband them. I'd love to hear what the players association has to say about this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The people who will be outraged by this are people that don't really pay attention (so who cares?) and greedy owners who don't want to spend the money to bring big talent in. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The funny thing about the LeBron situation was despite the bad press for him the most outraged people outside of Cleveland were those who dont really follow the game anyway. The league had huge ratings last year and the playoffs were very good from round 1 to the Finals. A huge portion was because of the interest created by LeBron. This is like the anti-LeBron situation. The Hornets arent a draw with Paul and while i'm not convinced that the deal would make the Lakers better the cancellation has made them worse just because you now have 2 key players knowing they were traded and that is Mike Brown on the Bench, not Phil Jackson. The 1st time Pau goes into a funk you can believe that Kobe will be killing him. I dont like the Lakers but the league is a better place when they are relevant. A Paul/Kobe backcourt would be fun to watch though the frontcourt would be potentially woeful if (when?) Bynum goes down. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ok so where does he end up next year. 10 months from now where is he long term? |
Quote:
|
I still thinks he ends up a Laker and so does Howard.
I like the NBA also and while I wasn't really too upset they were locked out...all of this talk has me looking forward to the season. |
Quote:
Battier to the Heat has to be a positive for them. Butler to Clippers is an under the radar move that may wind up being a big deal in the playoffs (yes I did just say the clips will be in the playoffs) Golden State will be interesting with Mark Jackson as coach OKC should be even better Whatwill happen in Boston? Can SA make 1 last run? Jimmer and the dysfunctional Kings (yes Joe because he is white and supposedly PG1985 schooled him in CYO league 12 years ago) |
Quote:
Is Kobe still Kobe? If the Lakers get both of them are they better then OK city or Miami anyway? Im not sure they are. |
Quote:
When did I say I schooled Jimmer, wtf??? I was a legend though. 34-17-14-12 was my line 6th grade year of Saint Anthonys. Anyway, Battier to Miami is gigantic. He is a great defender and can shoot. I love that move. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.