"Stronger Together" reviews...

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/15...b33934972487e1

:p


I was going to read this book…..I really was. But just as I got started, I found myself under sniper fire, passed out, and fell and hit my head. After that I got double vision and had to wear glasses that were so damn thick I couldn’t even see to read. Then I had an allergic reaction to something and started coughing so hard I spit out what looked like a couple of lizard’s eyeballs, my limbs locked up, and I passed out and fell down again, waking up only to find out I had been diagnosed with pneumonia 2 days earlier. Somehow I managed to power through it all, but it’s a good thing I was able to make a small fortune on this random small trade in the commodities market (cattle futures or some such thing) and then, miracle of all miracles, a few banks offered me a few million to just talk to their employees for a few minutes – and all that really helped out because I swear I was dead broke and couldn’t figure out how I was gonna come up with the 6 bucks to pay for this book, let alone pay the $1,500 for my health insurance this month. I still want to read it, but, honestly, what difference at this point does it make? I hear it sucks anyway.

Sept. 19th 2016
 

*Reaching out* {COUGH} to Millennials at Temple U in Philly (a school with an enrollment of 38,000 Millennials):



I guess 200 is better than none.

But not before having to be helped up a couple stairs. Again.



Jesse Watters captures the enthusiasm:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BKizLJVDmdi/


Meanwhile, in Ft. Myers, half the town showed up to a Trump rally:



Within hours of announcing the Fort Myers event at the 8,000 seat Germain Arena, the tickets were sold out. Scalpers were selling tickets to the event for $200-$400 dollars:



Don't believe the MSM. Don't do it.

^^^^^^^

>>>During a speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on Monday, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton appeared to have something quite off about her appearance.
Hillary’s eyes appeared not in-sync with one another, as the left eye looked to be cock-eyed and displaced, especially as she looked towards the left.<<<


http://www.theamericanmirror.com/mys...philly-speech/

From a week or so ago (Hillary is *resting* today):

https://twitter.com/margaretwxii/sta...86274725896193

"'Why aren't I 50 points ahead?' you might ask."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video...7ba_video.html

Shrillary is back...

with "a s__t ton of . . . " well, you decide.

https://youtu.be/nRp1CK_X_Yw

"The world's biggest __________ explain why it is important that you vote on November 8!"

Ooh Canadians...Sorry I'm American, and I can't vote in Canada!

Some of HRC's friends:

Make America Mexico Again

https://youtu.be/7kw9TOPnXFw

That video is her Dukakis Moment. Mark it down.

One would never get it from watching the MSM (including Fox), but Trump has many paths to 270 as it stands. Right now, the Real Clear Politics averages of polls has him slightly leading, or within the MOE in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia, New Hampshire.

Fact is, he doesn't need any of those states (though it would certainly help) to get to 270.

From the polling data analysis on Breitbart:

The reliably red Republican states—Alaska, Idaho, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Indiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, Alabama, Tennessee, West Virginia, and South Carolina—are all expected to easily vote for Trump for president. That totals 164 electoral votes.

And add in:

Georgia and Arizona, both of those states—per recent polling—have seemingly moved solidly into the Trump column. That’s another 27 electoral votes, for a total of 191 electoral votes with the other red states.
Florida with 29 electoral votes
Nevada and Iowa for a total of 12 more electoral votes
Maine’s Second Congressional District -and that is just one electoral vote
North Carolina’s 15 electoral votes

Then:

If Trump locks up Ohio’s 18 electoral votes, and adds them to everything else, he is at 266 electoral votes.

If Trump secures Colorado’s 9 electoral votes, along with everything else considered, he would win at least 275 electoral votes.

My opinion, she proves consistently day in and day out that she has no plan to improve the condition of the nation.

Most rational thinking adults realize you cannot simply ignore 20 Trillion dollars worth of debt and somehow think that solar panels and unicorn dust are going to save the country.

Most rational thinking adults realize that her tax plan is going to cripple the middle class and leave this country in a fiscally untenable condition for their children.

Most rational thinking adults realize that more regulations only cripple energy independence and keep us permanently reliant on the middle east for energy ( not surprising, considering how much money she takes from them).

Most rational thinking adults - even left leaning adults, realize that her appointments to the SCOTUS would irrevocably change the fabric on the nation towards a marxist-socialist state.

The right is coalescing around him each and every day. The NeverTrump movement is dead. Independents, while admittedly not thrilled with him, are seeing his vision as one that provides a better future for their children.

Gary Johnson has all but given up, Stein is drawing what few supporters she has away from HRC, and in a 2 way race, it is becoming more clear that Trump is likelier in the end.

Yeah, but she's a woman!! That's the ONLY important thing to many of the zombie left. They are weary of Obama, and want to follow up with another Democrat empty suit (or pants suit as it may be...)

Stuart Varney is going after Trump for the Mercado tweets last night.

I'm sorry but you can't hold moral standards for a man while defending a woman who took it in the arse on video and who also had coitus with the host of a show called "The Farm" while she was engaged to Bobby Abreu(sp?).

This is just part of her dirt.

So if women are equal then criticism is included, right? Or is total degeneracy allowed for women? And if so, why? Could it be to destroy western society/family?

Being completely honest, I saw it that morning and literally threw my tablet to the floor. The absolute LAST thing he needs to be getting drawn back into the gutter with. It is going to be a momentum killer b/c this is all they are going to focus on.

It is a complete double standard, agreed. And hopefully it is going to be a fading optic by the next news cycle but it may have an impact on shoring up the men-hating fembot vote.

What they are not talking about is her ever-eroding support within the African American community.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...-voters-228822

And it's not just Florida. They have mocked and scoffed at his African American Outreach initiative, but it absolutely is beginning to resonate.

The protestors (Trump supporters) outnumbered her rally attendees in Florida today.

Don't panic. Most of the polls the dems outnumber the reps 4-8% roughly.

It's a farce. They're in panic mode acting like Trump is in panic mode. Total nonsense.

Every poll I've looked at since the debate has been oversampled +Dem by as much as 8%. These are the ones MSLSD and Clinton News are crowing the loudest about the "post-debate bump"

So, I don't put much faith in any of it. Even the polls that have been fairly neutral-biased. Take this Mason Dixon FL poll which is +2 DEM oversampled:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/doc...ember_2016.pdf

When you boil this down, you see that there is no way to determine where this oversample is weighted. For example they show they polled 150 people in "Tampa Bay" but there is no breakdown of how this was weighted - i.e. how many (what%) of the 150 polled are Dems? How many Reps? How many of the registered Dems polled said they were leaning Trump? How many Registered Reps are leaning Clinton?

We know Bupkis.

We only know that 150 people were polled and she has a 7 point edge (which I can tell you living here is not the case in her wildest dreams).

What is very interesting though given the known oversample of +Dems and overall demographics, Trump enjoys 30% support among Hispanics.


That's Yuuuuge.

Surely we're not pointing fingers at degeneracy when Trump bragged about avoiding VD during Vietnam. He was running around like a dog with two d*cks while others were sacrificing their lives. What a complete and utter piece of shite tosser he is.

RBE :tro:

Cheeky I forgot that Bill Clinton got the Purple Heart in 'nam.

You're not British but just a sock of a former poster, right? If you are British I am highly disappointed.

Sock? Ha! I joined maybe a year ago, but I rarely post because I'm rubbish at handicapping. I'm still learning. Why would you be disappointed at my being from the UK? What do you know about Brits and this election that I don't know??

And no, Clinton didn't go to Vietnam (a stupid war) but he certainly didn't go around bragging about dodging.

Yes he did. He even joked about it to his pen pals.

Most Brits I know would never use ones avoidance of a rubbish war as a talking point.

Well, perhaps you don't know many who follow and have studied contemporary American politics.

I am not aware of Clinton joking about avoiding the war to his pen pals. Perhaps he did. I'm just not aware. I'll use "the Google" to see if I can find anything.

Can you link me to the sex tape? Because it looks like no one has seen said tape except Trumpers.

Latest poll to drop - Fox News poll 9/30:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/inte...ll-results-30/

Hillary +2 points since the last poll, BUT the sample was expanded from +1 Dem to +4 Dem.

She actually lost ground since the debate.

Fact Check, folks. It is all out there, do the math.

These "Scientific" Polls are 60 pages long. The data sets are buried 50 pages in. Don't be lazy. You can look at every one of them.

I find that hard to believe considering there are so many lesbians supporting her.

Or follow one of Palmer Luckey's paid trolls on Twitter. :o

:confused:

Lesbians supporting Alicia Machado?

Dan...what odds do you think are fair? Small wager with check to Byk for horse rescue...maybe $200?

I think the fair price right now is Hillary -200 (with no vig). Most places actually have her at about -280 right now, but that looks a little bit high considering that Nate Silver gives her a 69% chance of winning right now. If she had a 66.66% chance, that would mean she should be exactly -200. She has gotten a strong bounce from the debate. She was only about -140 or so a week ago.

Nate Silver had her chances of winning at about 54% last week. So she has definitely gotten a strong bounce. Here are the odds at several different places. Most places have her around -280 and Trump at +220 or so.

http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/...on-2016/winner

All people are talking about these days are things like Trump calling women fat. Nobody is talking about Hillary (as the head of the State Department) refusing to provide more security to our embassy in Benghazi, even though they had requested more security over 100 times. How is this not a major story? Hillary's judgement is atrocious. I think a good case can be made that she is directly responsible for those Americans dying in Benghazi.

Trump obviously has serious baggage. He has some major flaws. But if it came to an important decision such as whether grant the request to our embassy of having more security, I am confident that he would make the right decision. The reason Hillary didn't want the embassy to have more security was because she thought it might not look good to have armed guards patrolling the embassy. The embassy wouldn't look as friendly if there were armed guards stationed there. What is more important, protecting our embassy staff, or not wanting to take a chance of possibly offending someone? I would rather vote for a guy who says some stupid stuff, than for a person who refuses to protect our embassy.

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/...uced-security/

I offered to book Nate Sliver's number after the Dem Convention. The libs here scattered like cockroaches.

She can scream every pejorative term at him that she can dream up. That is all she has. Period. Her only claim to fame was riding her rapist husband's coattails into the white house. She has been abject failure at everything she has touched. Except accepting bribes...errr...speaking fees to be laundered through her and her husband's slush fund.

Nothing has changed, except that the media is in a full court press to save the establishment. Every poll is over sampled by Dems and Women by anywhere from 8 to 18%, yet her numbers are only showing 4-5% edge.

That is going backward.

They need the Governor of VA (another unindicted Clinton crony felon) to register illegals, dead people and and convicted criminals to try and steal the state from the real voters.

Panic Mode.

Hang on a minute...
 

First, just as a point of fact, Benghazi was not an embassy. It was a U.S. consulate office. Typically, U.S. Consulate offices do not have "armed guards." They are in place to help facilitate trade and "citizen to citizen" relations.

Second, what you cite as possible reasons for "denial" of protection for the CONSULATE is based on an OPINION piece. Not fact.

Finally, regarding Trump saying "stupid stuff." Have you ever heard of the saying, "Loose lips sink ships?" He is not running for secondary school president ("Vote for Pedro.") What he says could lead to world war. He needs to GROW UP, and so do his followers.

Why would the fact that other embassies and consulates have been attacked lessen the outrage over Hillary denying requests for more security? If anything, that should raise the outrage. If there had never been any consulate attacks, you could argue that there was no reasonable risk to the consulate. But since there has been a long history of attacks on consulates and embassies, there is no excuse for Hillary denying the requests for more security. In addition, there is obviously more risk in certain countries than others. In countries that have a great number of jihadists, you obviously need serious security.

With regards to your assertion that we don't know for sure what Hillary's reason was for denying the request, the reason is irrelevant. We know for sure that protecting the consulate was "not a high priority" to the State Department. Even the State Department Accountability Review Board said,
"The number of Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) security staff in Benghazi on the day of the attack and in the months and weeks leading up to it was inadequate, despite repeated requests from Special Mission Benghazi and Embassy Tripoli for additional staffing. Board members found a pervasive realization among personnel who served in Benghazi that the Special Mission was not a high priority for Washington when it came to security-related requests, especially those relating to staffing."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...eans/#comments

There is no excuse for not protecting your consulate employees.

With regard to your comment about Trump's big mouth possibly leading to war, I disagree with that. Most of our enemies out there like Iran are bullies. Bullies will push you around if you show weakness. If we have a tough leader that talks tough, our enemies are much more likely to respect us and fear us, than if we have a weak leader like Obama. You know the old slogan, "Peace Through Strength".

Brand new CBS poll -

Hillary "edges" away from Trump 45-41%

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-...-cbs-nyt-poll/

Yeah, right.


Poll sampling:

Registered Unweighted = Dem +4%; Registered Weighted = Dem +6%; Among likely voters = Dem +5%

https://www.scribd.com/document/3262...nes#from_embed

This is an interesting exercise only to those who believe HRC "denied" requests for more security when those requests did not go directly to her. Sure, they say the buck stops w/the person in charge, but it seems everyone is free to blame "low level" staff or chain of command except for HRC.

Which brings me to the reason for the graphic depicting embassies and consulates that have in the past been attacked. What previous attacks demonstrate is that not one Secretary of State in the Bush Administration (or a previous administration) was hauled into Congress to answer for those attacks. Dems are mature enough to understand that those who are serve around the world in the diplomatic service are at risk, particularly when serving in politically volatile areas.. [/quote]


She did not deny requests. Litigated. No wrongdoing found.

Trump has been described as a bully. Talks all sorts of shite about Mexicans and building a wall then tucks his tail in his bum when meeting the President of Mexico. No one respects Trump! No one! Even more importantly, no one is afraid of Trump. He has done nothing to demonstrate how strong he'd be... unless of course, if that strength involves insulting women.

Uh Oh.

LMFAO

If (when) Heartvalve McParkinsons kicks it, there's your pres. Dear God.

The MSM is trying to spin it like he won. CNN had the establishment baby killers on to shame rational people into voting for their hag.

I have to believe the American people are catching onto these 'folks'. When the shtf they will be flying to their first home.