|
|
 |
|
#1
04-18-2009, 07:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
why the switch of jockeys?
does anyone really beleive that the fault of stardom bound losing was mike smiths fault?
the horse has a one and only run which mike again did like her preious races but the horse came up short how can this be mike smiths fault? could it be possibly[if you looked at the horses 2 wins this year under new trainer frankel]that the horse either digressed as a 3 year old[which they sometimes do] or wasnt really trained up to her capabilities [look at the way previous trainer trained her as compared to frankel] i just think smith is getting a bum deal here getting replaced true hes getting replaced by the best jockey out there but i thought winning 5 or 6 in a row and closing for a 3rd would keep you on a horse i guess loyolty is lost in this sport 
|
|
#2
04-18-2009, 07:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
|
|
#3
04-18-2009, 10:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gomez is better.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#4
04-18-2009, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Amoss needs to address this question. He seems to think that the horse is along for the ride...at least that's what his handicapping suggests.
|
|
#5
04-18-2009, 09:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Assuming Gomez is better than Borel, shouldn't he be riding Rachel A?
|
|
#7
04-19-2009, 08:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
