Gomez replaces Smith on Stardom Bound

[MisterB]

Does anyone think a jockey can make a horse run faster than she can already run. Bad trip, bad result. Last in Cali was a awaking, she ain't that good anymore. Flaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat

[philcski]

A couple of my friends are still trying to justify the $5.7mm purchase price.

IEAH will be applying for TARP money soon I'm thinking...

[CSC]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

This might be the funniest reason I've ever read for changing riders:

http://www.brisnet.com/cgi-bin/edito...e.cgi?id=14680

NT

Sort of reminiscent to when Bailey took over for Smith on Cigar...

[CSC]

I served up a lob but no one bit....

So I'll say it, 15 in a row cannot be far behind..

[Travis Stone]

Originally Posted by CSC

Sort of reminiscent to when Bailey took over for Smith on Cigar...

If Stardom Bound becomes the next Cigar, you can dig-up this post, print it and I'll give you a $100 voucher.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Travis Stone

If Stardom Bound becomes the next Cigar, you can dig-up this post, print it and I'll give you a $100 voucher.

Thnx, I think your hundred is very safe.

[freddymo]

Originally Posted by MISTERGEE

did i hear someone replaced him on chantel too?

Post of the year considerations

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by CSC

Sort of reminiscent to when Bailey took over for Smith on Cigar...

It is?

When Smith chose to get off to ride Devil His Due, and Bailey inherited the ride....but yea I can see how you say that.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

It is?

When Smith chose to get off to ride Devil His Due, and Bailey inherited the ride....but yea I can see how you say that.

10 Point, It was sort of a tongue in cheek comment. I think Stardom Bound is a nice horse to give her some credit but if IEAH thinks Gomez is going to radically improve this horse with the Jockey change, they are surely kidding themselves. So yes I was kind of half serious, half joking with that Cigar remark.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by CSC

10 Point, It was sort of a tongue in cheek comment. I think Stardom Bound is a nice horse to give her some credit but if IEAH thinks Gomez is going to radically improve this horse with the Jockey change, they are surely kidding themselves. So yes I was kind of half serious, half joking with that Cigar remark.

Stardom Bound is a stretch running sprinter in my book, won the Breeders Cup at a distance because of the surface and she has some ability.

[Revidere]

I guess Iavarone is intending to run Stardom Bound in the Classic, because that's where I think Zenyatta will be. I saw this coming after the Ashland. Dutrow doesn't use Smith on anything so he was on borrowed time. I happen to like the filly since I saw her first start. Still do. I know that she has several detractors, but five grade 1's in a row is nothing to sneeze at.
Let's see if she gets pace on dirt in the Oaks and then decide. Maybe Laragh will be her rabbit!!!

My guess is she comes east. Prado will get the mount after Gomez and Anderson play mercenary throughout the summer. Smith may very well be back on her in October.

[Merlinsky]

Originally Posted by Travis Stone

If Stardom Bound becomes the next Cigar, you can dig-up this post, print it and I'll give you a $100 voucher.

Does this encompass both racetrack and breeding shed?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Revidere

I guess Iavarone is intending to run Stardom Bound in the Classic, because that's where I think Zenyatta will be. I saw this coming after the Ashland. Dutrow doesn't use Smith on anything so he was on borrowed time. I happen to like the filly since I saw her first start. Still do. I know that she has several detractors, but five grade 1's in a row is nothing to sneeze at.
Let's see if she gets pace on dirt in the Oaks and then decide. Maybe Laragh will be her rabbit!!!

My guess is she comes east. Prado will get the mount after Gomez and Anderson play mercenary throughout the summer. Smith may very well be back on her in October.

i will be very surprised if they run her there, considering their comments last year when it came up. some camps are more than willing to run a filly/mare vs colts, while others are not. i think her people fit in the latter category.

[miraja2]

Nobody really knows how many races he will actually be on her or if it will make any difference. Stardom Bound's recent defeat also didn't really have anything to do with Smith.
But still, can anybody really blame them for making that change? The business about the long-term plans and matchup with Zenyatta seems stupid, but does anybody doubt that Gomez is a better all-around rider than Smith? I know I don't. If they secretly think a jock-change will dramatically improve the horse's performance then, yeah, they are probably kidding themselves. But doesn't it make sense to go out and get the guy they think is the best? What am I missing?

[Danzig]

i don't think anyone is questioning going to gomez...but it is funny to most from what i can tell that they are still pointing stardom bound to a matchup vs arguably the best horse on a synthetic track.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i don't think anyone is questioning going to gomez...but it is funny to most from what i can tell that they are still pointing stardom bound to a matchup vs arguably the best horse on a synthetic track.

Perhaps they were just looking for a somewhat diplomatic way to switch to Gomez, and that is the excuse they came up with. If, on the other hand, they actually do think she can beat Zenyatta, well then yeah, I'd say it is a bit of semi-delusional wishful thinking.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by miraja2

Perhaps they were just looking for a somewhat diplomatic way to switch to Gomez, and that is the excuse they came up with. If, on the other hand, they actually do think she can beat Zenyatta, well then yeah, I'd say it is a bit of semi-delusional wishful thinking.

that's probably what it is. but i'd imagine everyone, smith included, knows it's really just that-an excuse. if you can get gomez, you get him.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I understand why you switch to Gomez, but their excuse was lame. There was talk here and on other boards blaming Smith for the Ashland, which in my opinion was crazy. I think IEAH is looking to blame someone because their big investment hasn't really panned out. Smith is an easy target.

and that horse is going backwards fast..

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I understand why you switch to Gomez, but their excuse was lame. There was talk here and on other boards blaming Smith for the Ashland, which in my opinion was crazy. I think IEAH is looking to blame someone because their big investment hasn't really panned out. Smith is an easy target.

they evidently haven't paid any attention to her races this year if they think the blame falls on smith.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by Danzig

they evidently haven't paid any attention to her races this year if they think the blame falls on smith.

Its always the riders fault...just ask anyone here when they lose.