Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Stakes Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2021, 05:55 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 42,548
Default

BEL Champagne S (G1): Jack Christopher 93 (Munnings) C. Brown/J. Ortiz
BEL Frizette S (G1): Echo Zulu 90 (Gun Runner) S. Asmussen/R. Santana
BEL Woodward S (G1): Art Collector 107 (Bernardini) W. Mott/L. Saez
BEL BEL Turf Sprint S (G3): Arrest Me Red 100 (Pioneerof the Nile) W. Ward/I. Ortiz
BEL Miss Grillo S (G2): Sail By 69 (Astern-AUS) L. Gyarmati/J. Alvarado
BEL Pilgrim S (G2): Annapolis 89 (War Front) T. Pletcher/I. Ortiz
BEL F-T Waya S (G3): My Sister Nat-FR 94 (Acclamation-GB) C. Brown/J. Ortiz
BEL John Hettinger S: Myhartblongstodady 78 (Scat Daddy) J. Abreu/J. Lezcano

SA Rodeo Drive S (G1): Going to Vegas 98 (Goldencents) R. Baltas/U. Rispoli
SA Awesome Again S (G1): Medina Spirit 107 (Protonico) B. Baffert/J. Velazquez
SA American Pharoah S (G1): Corniche 85 (Quality Road) B. Baffert/M. Smith
SA Chandelier S (G2): Ain't Easy 81 (Into Mischief) P. D'Amato/J. Rosario
SA John Henry Turf S (G2): United 99 (Giant's Causeway) R. Mandella/F. Prat
SA SA Sprint Ch. S (G2): Dr. Schivel 103 (Violence) M. Glatt/F. Prat
SA City of Hope Mile S (G2): Mo Forza 100 (Uncle Mo) P. Miller/F. Prat
SA Eddie D S (G2): Lieutenant Dan 99 (Grazen) S. Miyadi/G. Franco
SA Zenyatta S (G2): Private Mission 96 (Into Mischief) B. Baffert/F. Prat
SA Chillingworth S (G3): Ce Ce 95 (Elusive Quality) M. McCarthy/V. Espinoza
SA Speakeasy S: One Timer 70 (Trappe Shot) L. Rivelli/E. Baird
SA Surfer Girl S: Cairo Memories 70 (Cairo Prince) R. Hess/K. Desormeaux
SA Zuma Beach S: Mackinnon 76 (American Pharoah) D. O'Neill/J. Hernandez
SA Unzip Me S: Zero Tolerance 89 (Mizzen Mast) P. Miller/F. Prat
SA 2yo MSW (6f): Winning Map 85 (Liam's Map) B. Baffert/J. Velazquez
SA OC/N2X (8.5f): Eight Rings 98 (Empire Maker) B. Baffert/J. Velazquez
SA OC/N1X (1m-T): Subconscious 92 (Tapit) R. Mandella/J. Hernandez

CD Lukas Classic S (G3): Knicks Go 104 (Paynter) B. Cox/J. Rosario
CD Ack Ack S (G3): Plainsman 100 (Flatter) B. Cox/J. Rosario
CD Seneca S: Crazy Beautiful 91 (Liam's Map) K. McPeek/B. Hernandez
CD 2yo MSW (1m): Trafalgar 81 (Lord Nelson) A. Stall/J. Rosario
CD 2yo MSW (6.5f): Dr. Perry 82 (Into Mischief) S. Asmussen/J. Rosario
CD 3+ MSW (1m): Cody's Wish 92 (Curlin) B. Mott/J. Rosario

LRL Laurel Futurity: Ready to Purrform 74 (Kitten's Joy) B. Cox/J. Toledo
LRL Selima S: Consumer Spending 76 (More Than Ready) C. Brown/V. Carrasco
LRL Laurel Dash S: Xy Speed 90 (First Samurai) G. Bennett/J. Ruiz
LRL All Along S: Tuned-GB 90 (Toronado-IRE) H. Motion/F. Lynch
LRL Japan Turf Cup S: Tide of the Sea 92 (English Channel) M. Maker/H. Karamanos

WO Wonder Where S: Munnyfor Ro 78 (Munnings) K. Attard/J. Stein
WO Breeders' S: British Royalty 92 (English Channel) B. Minshall/P. Husbands
WO ON Fashion S (G3): Amalfi Coast 89 (Tapizar) K. Attard J. Stein

FL Lady Finger S: Curly Girl 52 (Nyquist) P. Barrow/A. Worrie
FL Aspirant S: Adios Asher 82 (Adios Charlie) L. Rivelli/E. Baird

PID Peach Street S: Talk Or Listen-IRE 90 (Alhebayeb-IRE) A. Delacour/P. Morales
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans

Last edited by Kasept : 10-04-2021 at 06:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2021, 11:06 AM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

Steve, do you have the Beyer for Youre to Blame in the fifth on Saturday?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2021, 11:52 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 42,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
Steve, do you have the Beyer for Youre to Blame in the fifth on Saturday?
91
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2021, 12:03 PM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

Thanks, Steve. I was interested because I thought Jack Christopher’s Beyer came back a little high, since it was the slowest Champagne(when run at a mile) since 1989. The mile time for the fifth on Saturday was virtually the same as JC’s final time 3 races later, so the number makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2021, 05:58 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
Thanks, Steve. I was interested because I thought Jack Christopher’s Beyer came back a little high, since it was the slowest Champagne(when run at a mile) since 1989. The mile time for the fifth on Saturday was virtually the same as JC’s final time 3 races later, so the number makes sense.
HUH?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2021, 09:21 PM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

I thought Jack Christopher’s Beyer of 93 was a little high for a race that was the slowest Champagne since 1989. So I wanted to compare it to the dirt routes that were run earlier on the card. The 4th race a 40 n2l claimer was not comparable, so I went to the 5th race, an 80 optional claimer @ 8 1/2 furlongs that the mile split was 1:37:2, one tick slower than JC’s mile. When that race came back with a 91 Beyer, I could see how JC was awarded a 93. However, I still feel the time of the Champagne was very mediocre, particularly the final 1/4 in 26:1. We shall see.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2021, 09:54 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
I thought Jack Christopher’s Beyer of 93 was a little high for a race that was the slowest Champagne since 1989. So I wanted to compare it to the dirt routes that were run earlier on the card. The 4th race a 40 n2l claimer was not comparable, so I went to the 5th race, an 80 optional claimer @ 8 1/2 furlongs that the mile split was 1:37:2, one tick slower than JC’s mile. When that race came back with a 91 Beyer, I could see how JC was awarded a 93. However, I still feel the time of the Champagne was very mediocre, particularly the final 1/4 in 26:1. We shall see.
You understand final fractions, especially in dirt races, are related to how quickly the early fractions were run....right?
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2021, 07:54 AM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

Yes, I am aware of that, but I don’t think an opening 1/4 of 23:4 should impact the final quarter that negatively. Like I said, we shall see.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2021, 08:48 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
Yes, I am aware of that, but I don’t think an opening 1/4 of 23:4 should impact the final quarter that negatively. Like I said, we shall see.
It's good not to tailor the truth to fit our personal agendas. Try comparing the first two fractions to those of the Woodward, as an aside a figure that for some reason you are not questioning despite it relying on the Champagne number being correct, before determining whether or not they were fast or slow.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2021, 09:06 AM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

I’m not attempting “ to tailor the truth.” I did not use theWoodward because it was 14 points higher and thus not comparable. I used the 5th race because it was comparable and it pointed out that the number was valid, which is all I was attempting to do, as I originally thought the number was too high but was proven wrong. P.S. I still don’t think that was a strong finish. We’ll find out down the road.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2021, 10:01 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
I’m not attempting “ to tailor the truth.” I did not use theWoodward because it was 14 points higher and thus not comparable. I used the 5th race because it was comparable and it pointed out that the number was valid, which is all I was attempting to do, as I originally thought the number was too high but was proven wrong. P.S. I still don’t think that was a strong finish. We’ll find out down the road.
Of course it's comparable. Making that statement sort of disqualifies you from questioning numbers. Not sure how an 8.5 furlong fig is comparable to an 8 furlong one while a 9 furlong one, all around one turn, is not.

We got it. You don't like Jack Christopher, a son of Munnings, in the KY Derby. Not exactly putting yourself out on a limb here. However, none of that has anything to do with his fig.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2021, 10:11 AM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

After this discourse. I can really sympathize with Anthony Stabile.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-05-2021, 10:48 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
After this discourse. I can really sympathize with Anthony Stabile.
Sorry if you have a problem with being asked to defend your opinion. Opinions have no merit if they can't be backed up....regardless of who gives them or where. I think true racing fans and bettors appreciate intelligent discourse.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-05-2021, 11:21 AM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

I do appreciate intelligent discourse. My prior comment about Anthony was “tongue in cheek” as I truly enjoy the pre card bantering between the two of you. As for defending myself, what’s to defend? I sought out a number, that number indicated my original hypothesis was incorrect. I then stated an opinion that can only be verified by future races.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-05-2021, 11:33 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
After this discourse. I can really sympathize with Anthony Stabile.
Perhaps you would like to purchase a few dozen of the lunch wagers he has lost to Andy?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-2021, 11:50 AM
southerndutch southerndutch is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 109
Default

It would be my pleasure to pick up the tab for a lunch with Andy.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-05-2021, 11:52 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
It would be my pleasure to pick up the tab for a lunch with Andy.
Freddy will be happy to hear there is some relief on the way:-)
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-05-2021, 12:06 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southerndutch View Post
It would be my pleasure to pick up the tab for a lunch with Andy.
I was kidding as well. The reality is we are all interested in the puzzle that is handicapping. Making figures is fairly rudimentary, knowing how to apply them in your sausage making is much more difficult. Did the 91 fig for Jackies Warrior have much value? Was it a good speed value for the race that day, Yes?.
The second race of his career against a good group that smells like a really good data-based number. Do I like prospects of the TAP that finished second better sure but like you say we will see?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-05-2021, 12:11 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Freddy will be happy to hear there is some relief on the way:-)
I think for Christmas I am going to buy out Stabile's position from him and let him start over again in '22 a fresh gelding. I will donate a thousand bucks to TRF or Chaplaincy in his name. Somebody has to get him out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.