Good Article About Clinton

[Rupert Pupkin]

The thing that is so ridiculous about the Clinton interview is that the liberals actually think that Wallace did something wrong. They think he was out of line and Clinton put him in his place. That is absurd. What did Wallace do wrong? Wallace was very respectful and he asked a fair question. He didn't attack Clinton. He asked him if he felt that they did enough with regard to Bin Laden. That's not a legitmate question? What are you guys thinking?

The reason everyone is making a big deal about the interview is because Clinton got so angry over nothing. Why would a guy get so mad about a fairly easy and predictable question. Have you guys ever watched Meet the Press? Have you heard the questions that Tim Russert asks to guys like Rumsfeld and Cheney? He asks them much more confrontational questions than Wallace asked? They don't get angry. They answer the questions.