![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think it's important to remember that the reason Social Security was created has not gone away. Starving, homeless old people - well, we are America. I don't think we should do that to our elderly. I don't believe in, "Every man for himself" 100% of the time. Nor do I believe in complete American isolation on the world scene. This is 2010, not the 19th century. That said, most people nowadays are getting out more than they put into Social Security, as they are living longer, etc. That is one of the reasons why Social Security is upside down. That said, it is currently funded through 2025. "Liberalism" - in the form of Bill Clinton - put us into a positive budget, with extra money, with the federal deficit beginning to be paid off, and significant reduction in the deficit over the first 10 years. Unfortunately, that setup was reversed, not done, which has put the country in a terrible place. So "liberalism" doesn't seem an obsolete anachronism to me. And if you are viewing it within the context of federal fiscal irresponsibility (I can't tell), you have the wrong party, judging by the facts of the the past 40-50 years of American history. Increasing taxes, increasing deficit, is a Republican thing. For example, the largest single entitlement, $$ wise, in the past 40 years, with the exception of the start of Medicare - just occurred in the Bush administration, and unfortunately, was not funded.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |