usc

#1 01-02-2009, 11:57 PM

Hey morons did you notice how many times Wilson was pressured and sacked? Did you see the Outland Trophy winner in the god damn game?

God damn morons. You're all f.ucking retarded. Utah is not the national champion. What they faced was a team that had a secondary exposed by Florida and Utah fed on the game film. Plus the best offensive lineman in the country out with very little depth at the position and BAM! A god damn upset.

YOU'RE ALL GOD DAMN IDIOTS. USC SUCKS. BIG TEN SUCKS. YOUR TEAM SUCKS. THE WHOLE GOD DAMN SEASON SUCKED AND ALL OF THE TEAMS SUCKED COMPARED TO YEARS PAST.

NOW SHUT THE GOD DAMN EVERLIVING F.UCK UP

timmgirvan · #2 01-02-2009, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Hey morons did you notice how many times Wilson was pressured and sacked? Did you see the Outland Trophy winner in the god damn game?

God damn morons. You're all f.ucking retarded. Utah is not the national champion. What they faced was a team that had a secondary exposed by Florida and Utah fed on the game film. Plus the best offensive lineman in the country out with very little depth at the position and BAM! A god damn upset.

YOU'RE ALL GOD DAMN IDIOTS. USC SUCKS. BIG TEN SUCKS. YOUR TEAM SUCKS. THE WHOLE GOD DAMN SEASON SUCKED AND ALL OF THE TEAMS SUCKED COMPARED TO YEARS PAST.

NOW SHUT THE GOD DAMN EVERLIVING F.UCK UP

WOW.....I guess your parlay got ruined,huh?

declansharbor · #3 01-03-2009, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

WOW.....I guess your parlay got ruined,huh?

Dimmy. You gotta learn when to just keep it quiet and keep it movin. Nothing to see here, hurry along now.

Oh yeah....Michigan Rules!!!!!

timmgirvan · #4 01-03-2009, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by declansharbor

Dimmy. You gotta learn when to just keep it quiet and keep it movin. Nothing to see here, hurry along now.

I laughed!

#5 01-03-2009, 12:03 AM

yeah Phil Donahue even if Smith played it wouldn't have mattered. That's like saying Florida doesn't need Tebow.

AH DURHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

SniperSB23 · #6 01-03-2009, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

yeah Phil Donahue even if Smith played it wouldn't have mattered. That's like saying Florida doesn't need Tebow.

AH DURHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Only if Smith was a lockdown corner.

philcski · #7 01-03-2009, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Hey morons did you notice how many times Wilson was pressured and sacked? Did you see the Outland Trophy winner in the god damn game?

God damn morons. You're all f.ucking retarded. Utah is not the national champion. What they faced was a team that had a secondary exposed by Florida and Utah fed on the game film. Plus the best offensive lineman in the country out with very little depth at the position and BAM! A god damn upset.

Total yards 353-208
Turnovers 1-3
First downs 22-15

quarterbacks:
27-41 336 yards 3 tds-0 ints
18-30 177 yards 1 td - 2 ints

Doesn't look like an 'upset' to me. Bama got rolled by a better team.

#8 01-03-2009, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

Total yards 353-208
Turnovers 1-3
First downs 22-15

quarterbacks:
27-41 336 yards 3 tds-0 ints
18-30 177 yards 1 td - 2 ints

Doesn't look like an 'upset' to me. Bama got rolled by a better team.

Yes and those stats wouldn't have changed much with Smith in the game.
Dumb f.uck. Stat dork.

timmgirvan · #9 01-03-2009, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Yes and those stats wouldn't have changed much with Smith in the game.
Dumb f.uck. Stat dork.

tsk...tsk....tsk!

philcski · #10 01-03-2009, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Yes and those stats wouldn't have changed much with Smith in the game.
Dumb f.uck. Stat dork.

Enough already. Anybody would have said the same thing watching the game tonight. Was he going to play defensive back to stop the Utah QB tearing them apart too? Whatever. JP Wilson sucks and got exposed. No shocker there. I love how you summarily dismiss the MWC just because it's not a 'BCS' conference. I'm a Big East guy, that conference was TONS better than the Big East, ACC, and Pac 10 this year.

timmgirvan · #11 01-03-2009, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

Enough already. Anybody would have said the same thing watching the game tonight. Was he going to play defensive back to stop the Utah QB tearing them apart too? Whatever. JP Wilson sucks and got exposed. No shocker there. I love how you summarily dismiss the MWC just because it's not a 'BCS' conference. I'm a Big East guy, that conference was TONS better than the Big East, ACC, and Pac 10 this year.

Pac-10 was 5-0 in bowls this year!

philcski · #12 01-03-2009, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Pac-10 was 5-0 in bowls this year!

...and got rolled by the MWC in the regular season.

timmgirvan · #13 01-03-2009, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

...and got rolled by the MWC in the regular season.

Don't have the stats on that....but the bowls are the big deal,right? Cash driven bowl insanity...but there it is....

Smooth Operator · #14 01-03-2009, 12:27 AM

Lol, Pants ... Bama was overrated. Great fun watching them get exposed by Yutes.

Trojans RULE!!!

#15 01-03-2009, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

Enough already. Anybody would have said the same thing watching the game tonight. Was he going to play defensive back to stop the Utah QB tearing them apart too? Whatever. JP Wilson sucks and got exposed. No shocker there. I love how you summarily dismiss the MWC just because it's not a 'BCS' conference. I'm a Big East guy, that conference was TONS better than the Big East, ACC, and Pac 10 this year.

His presence would've made all the difference, punchy. They couldn't establish a solid run game without him.

You're so quick to throw stats around. Take a look back at the Bama-Tulane game. Smith didn't play.

Now try to weasel your way out of that one and say his presence wouldn't have mattered tonight.

philcski · #16 01-03-2009, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

His presence would've made all the difference, punchy. They couldn't establish a solid run game without him.

You're so quick to throw stats around. Take a look back at the Bama-Tulane game. Smith didn't play.

Now try to weasel your way out of that one and say his presence wouldn't have mattered tonight.

JP Wilson sucked in that game too. Shocker there.

OK, so let me ask you this, because I respect your handicapping opinions.... if you thought it was such a big deal before the game that he wasn't playing,

why the fu.ck did you make your biggest bet of the year on them?????? you're smarter than that.

#17 01-03-2009, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

JP Wilson sucked in that game too. Shocker there.

OK, so let me ask you this, because I respect your handicapping opinions.... if you thought it was such a big deal before the game that he wasn't playing,

why the fu.ck did you make your biggest bet of the year on them?????? you're smarter than that.

That wasn't my biggest bet of the year.

And quite frankly the only reason why Bama didn't cover is because of the 21 point fluke in the 1st quarter. That was a fluke. It hardly ever happens and I don't want to hear otherwise.

I bet my team. I root for Bama and bleed Crimson. I could give a **** about the money. I'm royally pissed about them losing. I'd be happy as hell if they won by 1.

SniperSB23 · #18 01-03-2009, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Yes and those stats wouldn't have changed much with Smith in the game.
Dumb f.uck. Stat dork.

The fact is their secondary got diced and they were victimized by a bunch of well timed blitzes that Smith would have had nothing to do with picking up. He certainly would have helped but I don't think he makes the difference.

#19 01-03-2009, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

The fact is their secondary got diced and they were victimized by a bunch of well timed blitzes that Smith would have had nothing to do with picking up. He certainly would have helped but I don't think he makes the difference.

Again you and Phil underestimate offensive lineman. They aren't easy to come by and with a game manager at QB instead of a game maker losing a great offensive lineman makes an absolutely tremendous difference.

SniperSB23 · #20 01-03-2009, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Again you and Phil underestimate offensive lineman. They aren't easy to come by and with a game manager at QB instead of a game maker losing a great offensive lineman makes an absolutely tremendous difference.

I'm not arguing that he would have helped, but most of the key sacks came from well timed blitzes that the QB did not see coming rather than someone beating the replacement so I don't see him being the difference.