Yes, again, your original link is one man's testimony. Pardon me for thinking that one man's testimony isn't enough to mandate a settlement in favor of the plaintiff.
Why exactly was it dismissed?
Because I can't find it, and you either can't or won't provide it. You provided a link to one person's testimony in it. As I have said, other information and testimony just might have some bearing on the case and why it was dismissed.
*See above*
Yes, you are guessing.
How do you know what the settlement included? Is it published?
And your source for "in exchange for removing Ann's name" is...? All I read is that Ann Romney was dropped from the suit. Is that the same as settling?
Sounds like? How do you know that the Romney's refunded the $?
I don't know that the judge prevented the defendants from talking about anything. Where did you read/hear this?
I don't know "what Defendant Sanctions the Romney's requested be lifted by the judge." Do you? I don't even
know that the Romney's made such a request. Where did you read/hear this?
Again, where do you get your information that the "Romneys pay off the filer of the lawsuit?" Give me the source so that I will know that it's true. Or am I an
idiot for asking?
Source? Or is it just supposed to be "obvious" that the Romney's paid? Where did you read/hear this? That's all I am asking for. If it's true, it's relevant. But I'm not accepting it as fact unless/until it's sourced.
Earlier I asked you about this "payoff," or "reimbursement," you said
So, when I asked you for the sources of these public statements, all I got was
