Quote:
Originally Posted by wiphan
SO why would a buyer spend $125k on a horse that hasn't shown in 2 1/2 years? Doesn't seem to add up at all.
|
Yeah, how about that ... when the buyer showed up to try the horse, was the buyer TOLD the horse couldn't be shown? Was the buyer TOLD the horse had ringbone, which eliminated it as a dressage horse?
Any buyer will walk away immediately from any horse with ringbone. Everyone knows that.
Nope. A horse, drugged up to pass for sound, was introduced as horse who was capable of doing upper level dressage. here you go, try the horse! And they accepted the check for $125,000.
I can't believe you are trying to defend these low life scum horse dealers, and trying to blame the victim of their fraud and deceit.
Quote:
|
If you have $125k to spend on a horse you can spend money to find a reliable vet that you trust to do a pre-purchase exam.
|
Buyer did get a second opinion, after being defrauded by the first veterinarian - unexpected, I'm sure - and that's how this scam was exposed. Of course, the Romney's had no idea!
Okay, guys, your turn: Let's hear the plausible way this went down, consistent with the findings and dates in the expert witness statement, that shows the Romney's could not have know their lame horse was sold as sound. For $125,000.
Explain how the Romney's are innocent and unknowing.