Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
The additional pages are the drug report, also photocopied into that story.
I posted a good solid link to the original story, with much detail - and you said you've read the NYT piece. But much of what you complain about as being non-existent is actually within those stories.
As I've said, the rest is readily available in the various news media accounts of this in recent times, expanding upon those two stories.
So I suggest you specify in detail what information you cannot find in those stories, that you object to, and why.
|
Yes, again, your original link is one man's testimony. Pardon me for thinking that one man's testimony isn't enough to mandate a settlement in favor of the plaintiff.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
This was clearly not dismissed as "there was no case".
|
Why exactly was it dismissed?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Why don't you ignore the reporters, and read the actual complaint yourself?
|
Because I can't find it, and you either can't or won't provide it. You provided a link to one person's testimony in it. As I have said, other information and testimony just might have some bearing on the case and why it was dismissed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Unlike you, I did take the time to read the entire complaint before I even posted the thread, and thus have the facts informing my opinion.
|
*See above*
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
I'll guess that $125,000 profit on the lame horse Ann couldn't ride any longer helped offset the farm business deduction losses (like that $77,000), to make one of those 2 out of 7 years profitable on Mitt's tax return. So he can continue to claim the horses as a business, rather than an unprofitable hobby.
|
Yes, you are guessing.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Why did the settlement include getting Ann Romney's name off all the legal documents?
|
How do you know what the settlement included? Is it published?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
So dang - Mitt is running for President, and the press still dug up this story - even though they settled out of court in exchange for removing Ann's name from the court records to try and hide the lawsuit
|
And your source for "in exchange for removing Ann's name" is...? All I read is that Ann Romney was dropped from the suit. Is that the same as settling?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
It sounds like Mitt Romney got Ann's name off the court case, in exchange for a refund of the $125,000 plus expenses
|
Sounds like? How do you know that the Romney's refunded the $?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
What do you suppose the judge prevented the Defendants from talking about? What do you think that was all about? The evidence regarding Defendants the judge said wouldn't be released?
|
I don't know that the judge prevented the defendants from talking about anything. Where did you read/hear this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
And I still wonder what Defendant Sanctions the Romney's requested be lifted by the judge?
|
I don't know "what Defendant Sanctions the Romney's requested be lifted by the judge." Do you? I don't even
know that the Romney's made such a request. Where did you read/hear this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Romneys pay off the filer of the lawsuit, try to have them sign confidentiality agreements (fail), and after the lawsuit moves through court for 18 months, panic and settle immediately before lawsuit goes to a judge in exchange for removing Romneys name from it
|
Again, where do you get your information that the "Romneys pay off the filer of the lawsuit?" Give me the source so that I will know that it's true. Or am I an
idiot for asking?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
After 18 months, immediately before the lawsuit was to be heard in court, the lawsuit was settled out of court, at the request of the Romney's, in exchange for reimbursement of the sale price of the horse
|
Source? Or is it just supposed to be "obvious" that the Romney's paid? Where did you read/hear this? That's all I am asking for. If it's true, it's relevant. But I'm not accepting it as fact unless/until it's sourced.
Earlier I asked you about this "payoff," or "reimbursement," you said
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
The statements of the horse owner, and of her lawyer, and of opposing lawyers, publicly, combined with what ultimately happened to the horse.
|
So, when I asked you for the sources of these public statements, all I got was
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Good grief? why start now?
|
