Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDog
No responses to the rest of my questions?
|
No. Because you have proven you are disingenuous and unserious about the facts in this case. You have already shown repeatedly that you haven't bothered to read carefully what has already been posted.
Several times you've gotten all indignant and demanding about specific information, demanding "where is the link?" for things that were
included in documents already given you.
That you alleged you had "read". But clearly had not.
The two main documents have been posted here. There is much more out there in the press if you simply use google.
I'm not catering to your further demands for "information", because
you've already proven you couldn't be bothered to read what has already been given you.
You're either astoundingly lazy, or clearly unserious about anything other than public posturing.
I doubt you're lazy.
So if you truly have any serious interest in discussing this case - which I doubt, you are merely posturing for public effect - YOU post the acts surrounding the case that
you acknowlege you are awares of, and we'll go on with further discussion from there.