Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis
Because the perception of a Playboy model objectifies women, and a Victoria's Secret model doesn't? 
In reality, and to follow your logic, to pay any sort of a complement to any woman based solely on their looks should be considered "Sexist"
I love when people want tell others how to think, feel, and act based on what their perceptions are - because they are the ones that make complete sense.
Don't patronize him because he is old, he has every right to say that some of the women on Fox News are attractive enough to be in Playboy, and should not feel intimidated by the PC police to do so. |
I wasn't patronizing him and if he took it as such (Big Run if you took it that way) I am sorry.
Seems to me that older men think it's somehow cute.
I am not the PC police.
There IS a difference to me... one is done in very good taste and leaves much to the imagination. The other? Not so much but then honestly I have not seen an issue of Playboy in quite some time.
Really Rudeboy I keep my mouth shut so much of the time because I know whatever I say will be twisted around somehow...
I am pretty sure that Big Run knows exactly how I meant my comment to be taken. Sorry to disappoint if you're looking for an argument... I'm going back to the nice safe horsie threads.