Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
If put in the same situation, would you cheat? If the answer is no then why would you defend this?
Either
A) Sciacca's barn knowingly did this
B) The investigator set them up
C) The investigator doesn't know how to identify horses and made a mistake
Feel free to tell me if there is another option
Out of those three options which seems more likely?
|
i would NOT cheat. ever. where would the joy in winning come from?
as for which is most likely, i have no way of knowing, as i don't know much about the trainer in question.
was the horse in question tested? was it proven that a horse about to race had been milkshaked?