Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlinsky
Zenyatta would eat him for her in-flight meal.
Oh please. How's it not valid criticism? They've made a point of directing where their horse goes for races or parading based on money (not purses, things like appearance fees and bonuses). They've straight up said it. Los Al must've refused their demand to pay Chrome's expenses to the BC. They were trying to demand that since they'd be skipping the Awesome Again (a Win and You're In, I believe) to run in a Los Al Mile. Apparently he's not a parade horse...unless you cough up the  and then they'll find it in their hearts. They're not letting Art Sherman pick spots based on what's right for the horse first, and you can tell from how he phrases things to the media. The man's a saint. I don't believe in the slightest that they pick spots based on sportsmanship. They've shown their colors there. It's one thing to be upset after a race, but you refuse to comment and get back to them later. You don't smack talk and then double down after you should've cooled down instead.
You've set up a lot of straw men there. I guess we shouldn't criticize anybody ever.  |
since when is trying to get some money a bad thing? these people aren't exactly the phippses.
the horse needs a race, he's getting a race.
if people don't like the owners, that's fine.
but to infer they're greedy and wrong for shipping imo is just criticism for the sake of criticizing the owners, who aren't likable...rather than criticizing because it's a legit complaint.
criticizing his comments post belmont is one thing, criticizing the owners for sending a horse to a graded race with a purse-that's bs.