Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
So Chuck Streva's chart for that particular race is ridiculous to use as an example of an independent opinion of the race because you feel there is collusion between Stewards and chart callers regarding DQ's?
In other words if the horse hadn't come down Chuck would have worded the chart in a different manner?
|
Again, you are just making **** up. I never said there was collusion. I'm just giving what I see. Why, AGAIN, I don't know. I don't think there is any plotting going on behind the scenes as you imply.
Had the horse not come down, I don't think we'd have gotten the same narrative based on my experience. Of course I don't know that as fact in this particular instance, nor do you.
You didn't answer my last question, maybe you'll answer this one. Do you think the opinion of the stewards can influence the chart maker? Isn't that possible without it being some grand conspiracy?