Quote:
|
Originally Posted by oracle80
And **** you and your beneath ****.
I'm pointing out that some real slow horses ran real fast today.
I also didn't knock his effort which I said was great.
Anyone who would debate that it was a great effort is insane.
But the raw time seemed tobe mentioned in every post, and I really feel that anyone using that raw time as gospel without telling all the facts about the speed of the track isn't telling the whole story.
I suppose that horse who won the non 1 other than in 1:21:3 should be on the grade one trail now as well?
Pointing out a scorching surface while still calling something a great effort isn't hating, and its an outright LIE to accuse me of hating on the horse.
|
LOL it's quotes like this that are the problem Mike. "I just don't know if anyone
besides me ever watches undercards and realizes how incredibly fast this track was playing." No there are a bunch of people here with their head up their ass, right.
Always a pissing contest here. Nonsense. And the way your inital posts read they sure do seem to be taking something away from the horse. This effort was every bit as impressive as Zapper's Met Mile and will come up with a comparable figure. What else do you want him to do?