View Single Post
  #38  
Old 11-25-2006, 06:18 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Glorious
Does anyone know when they started timing races in the hundredths at Aqueduct? The reason I ask is because I am thinking that when Easy Goer ran his 1:32 2/5, they were still timing in 5ths and they just gave him the fastest possible time when saying that he ran 1:32.40 If they were still timing in 5ths at the time, then EG's actual time was anywhere between 1:32.40 and 1:32.59 which means that with with his 1:32.46, there is an above average chance that Discreet Cat actually broke EG's mark even though he won't get credit for even equalling it. Yes, I know that they are saying that he equalled the record, and by 5ths he did. I was looking at Equibase though and they listed the record at 1:32.40 so DC won't get credited for equalling the record.
I'd recommend having a couple of beers and forgetting about it. I can't see where this makes any difference splitting hairs like this. Did you have some big future wager on whether or not the AQU track record would be broken this year?
Whether he equaled, was a hair better, or a hair worse, it was damn fast.
Reply With Quote