Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDog
Allowing that I am unfamiliar, thankfully, with grand jury indictments, I notice that the indictments against Webb and Rogers refer specifically to one alleged act of injecting a specific horse, while the indictment against Wells lays out a more general scenario with no references to specific dates, horses or medications. Are both situations "normal" for grand jury indictments?
|
yes. they are seated to look at all gathered evidence to see if charges should be placed it could be one, a couple, or hundreds of charges..