Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62
I define dumber than most as someone desperately hanging on thinking that one party is better than the other. Talk about insanity.  |
i agree. both parties are funded by the very rich. so there's a reason why all these laws pass, and who they're passed for.
when one considers who the other main candidate was in the most recent election, i'm not sure how anyone can say people who voted for obama are 'more foolish than most'. i didn't vote for either the douchebag or the turd sandwich. oh, what would happen if everyone picked 'c' in the next presidential run? what if the republiecans had found a better candidate? probably wouldn't matter-they are just as determined to insert themselves in health care issues.
Quote:
As to your point above, it's not the government's business what insurance anyone carries or what kind of policy they want: "Cadillac" plan, low coverage catastrophic only plan, whatever. i agree. i think i've made that point more than once.
The power grab by Obama that he now seeks to sustain is unconstitutional - regardless of what the Supreme Court says. Read the Constitution and you will clearly see that taking over the citizens' health care, depriving them of choices and jacking their rates up a couple of hundred percent do not fit into the enumerated powers that the federal government has. since scotus ruled, i'm not sure how you can ignore their ruling, or say that govt insertion into health care is unconstitutional. and the govt has already been in the health business for years, with medicare and medicaid.
The government screwed this woman over - and it did not need to happen and never should have been considered. no. united healthcare opted to leave cali. but with the new govt rules, she can get coverage elsewhere, where beforehand she would have been left out in the cold due to pre-existing conditions.
|