Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Oh, no,all 5 previous grade 1 winners of a sprint are off the board in the B C Sprint,but you could have seen that pure as f'n snow by capping.The sheets,and every other capping mechanism all pointed to the 5 previous grade 1 winners all being out of the tri in this Grade 1.We are not talking about winning here.I am talking about hitting the board.You're telling me that good handicapping would make it obvious that the previous 5 grade 1 winning sprinters in the race(as well as TM Bling) were gunna run out of the money? You make no sense.ZERO.Deny,like the Churchill Shills that you are,but people who know how to cap,know that track was f'd up.This is what almost always happens when a mistake is made.Deny the obvious.Attack the messenger.The problem is that all the evidence is on one side,It is overwhelming(as I just gave you about n grade 1 winners even hitting the board in the sprint.)No matter what,if you don't want to see it, you will deny the words of trainers who admit they benefitted by a quick inside strip.Why would they say this? Why would ONEIL say it was obvious the inside was the place to be? Why? It makes no sense.All the Churchill Shills can say is that people who lose blame the track surface.Oh,never mind the BC SPRINT Winning trainer also said it.What is your reason for him saying it? Come on.Make some sense, you shills.
|
The BC Sprint is the biggest crapshoot out there. Henny ran a terrible race, it had nothing to do with a rail bias. Bordonaro ran 4th. I don't even know who the other three G1 winners are, I guess Pomeroy was one. How did that rail bring Nightmare Affair up into the tri. If he ran that good despite the bias then are we really to believe that Nighmare Affair would have won the BC Sprint if there wasn't a rail bias? It was a hard race to come up with from capping, virtually impossible but that is nothing unusual for a BC Sprint.
I'm a Churchill shill? That's a new one.
O'Neill saying there was a bias was a brilliant move as I've said before on here. He offers it up while talking about his gelded BC Sprint winner that has no breeding value and in turn gives his intact Juvenile an excuse for running third.