[Danzig]

have you read the dissent?

the majority gave a ruling based on 'identity'. scalie completely demolishes that reasoning, and excoriates the 'logic' behind the ruling. the dna swab was NOT to search identity, which was what the majority based their decision on.
also, his dissent explains in detail about searching based not on probable cause, but on finding probable cause. he also explains that fingerprinting has never been ruled on by scotus, it's one of those things that we've become inured to with time.
you know, what this admin is hoping we will become regarding emails, etc? and we've seen majority opinions be wrong, and later overturned. i'm hoping that's what happens here.

again, have you read the dissent? if not, you're refusing to look into something that may sway your thinking. better not do that, right?