Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
Get pulled over in Wisconsin and refuse a breathalyzer you get taken to the nearest hospital for a forcible blood draw though DNA is not tested. A reason to get pulled over in some towns is driving after midnight. Guess I may be a bit numb to the POTUS ruling but what's good enough for a suspected drunk driver is good enough for a suspected rapist.
So what should be done in your opinion? Let the rapist go, damn the 53 year-old victim so no one will wrongly go to jail in the future?
BTW Chicago and other IL towns have had a ban on handguns, even in one's own home yet not a peep about how the 2nd Amendment wasn't just chipped away but abolished.
|
scotus just ruled against warrantless blood draws.
i don't think dna should be collected until after conviction. and as for chicago and others with gun bans, there hasn't been a peep?
scotus threw out washinton dc's handgun ban as unconstitutional, and the nra immediately filed suit against chicagos law.
the lower court ruling overturning his rape conviction should not have been overturned imo. do i find that palatable? no. would it have been correct constitutionally? yes.