Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord
He's ridden over 4,400 races in his career as a jockey -- and he's showing a flat-bet profit.
I've never met the guy, never heard the guy talk, I don't know him. If you want to call him one of my pets, it's because I like what I've seen from him.
I agree with a lot of what you said, and disagree with pretty much none of it.
There just was never a good option for him, and that was the result largely of stuff out of his control (losing the break, his chief rival having a tactical edge and getting no pressure at all, and his horse not wanting to settle)
Was it a bad ride? Technically, yes. But, those aren't the kind of rides that I believe are trademarks of bad jockeys. The more egregious errors are the ones where riders actually have good options available to them and instead make bad decisions. And the bad jockeys make a habit of commiting those egregious errors.
|
You used egregious twice in that post.
Did you just learn that word?