[Dunbar]

Originally Posted by redransom

I haven't figured out why anyone really gives a c-rap about what the Maktoums do with their money. If they want to buy and retire every one of their horses prematurely, why can't they? When they spend, that money trickles down to all of us. Why do you think Keeneland has such high purses? Because they're supplemented by the sales. High purses draw better horses, better horses draw more handicappers (and the "just fan" types who like to watch the good horses) and then create even more money for purses. Don't even get me started on how multi-million-dollar sales trickles down into the horse communities in general; the bonuses are just too easy to list.

...

But if the Maktoums want to retire all of their horses at three, why can't they? They're their horses and they can do with them what they please. And if the breeders want to not send their mares to him, then more power to them. That's the way to get them if people are really mad, don't you think? If people in the game are really pi$$ed off, just don't send your mare to their stallions. Simple as that.

What, keeping the horse in training is the "sporting" thing to do to keep the fans happy? Does anyone think the handle generated by gambling on stakes races really boosts purses? What, we lose fans who don't have superstars to follow? Well let it be a lesson to all of us -- pick horses not owned by the Maktoums and maybe that will make us happy. Of course you could pick one to follow not owned by the Maktoums and not sold for seven figures in a true sportsman move (or eight, if the rumors are correct) and have him dead from cancer after two races as a 4-year-old.

I wasn't a Bernardini fan until his tenacious second in the Breeders' Cup, so I'm not losing much. But I will say that I won't be getting on a Darley/Godolphin horse bandwagon any time soon because I like to see them run.

Your first 2 sentences seem inconsistent with your last 2 sentences. fwiw, I agree with the last 2.

--Dunbar