Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss
I took the total opposite away from it. If it's needed so much, why did the horse run so well without it? Did he ever need it to begin with, because if he didn't, why are they using it on him?
|
but i thought in all the discussion on here that there's no way to know if a horse will bleed beforehand-and that's why many err on the side of caution? perhaps he bled in the past, and that's why they used it?
i know, i know, i give people benefit of the doubt probably too often, so in this regard i take the 'doing it to prevent harm' line of reasoning.
ic, that's not necessarily a 'fix' of what i wrote.