[King Glorious]

Did this writer just say that if the Sheikhs were sporting.........like Mary Lou Whitney? The same MLW that retired the 3yo classic winning Birdstone before he could run as a 4yo? Someone care to explain how that's not hypocritical on his part for writing that?

I wonder how people would feel if instead of Invasor, they had ran Discreet Cat in the Classic......and he finished 7th as Bernardini romped home. I guess that would have been the sporting thing to do. Forget the fact (as the writer seemed to do) that they also own the horse that won the Classic. If they weren't sporting, they could have easily left Invasor sitting in the barn with Discreet Cat while Bernardini rolled to victory and with it, HOY and all of the accolades that come with it. Instead, they ran the two best horses in the race and that's still not enough for some of u.

People forget that the Sheikhs are into this game more on the breeding side than on the racing side. They didn't buy Bernardini as a racing prospect. They bought him as a breeding prospect and after giving him a season on the track, they are putting him to the use they bought him for. People keep talking about all the money they have and how they don't need the money from him being at stud. Those that say that are right; they don't need the money. But what they are hoping Bernardini can give them is something that all of their money can't buy; a homebred Derby winner. They would rather breed one Derby winner than buy 10 at the sales. People have different passions and ambitions in this game. They are chasing theirs. Why is that wrong? Why do they "owe" us more?