Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
probably about 2% of the people who showed up did it to support free speech (which I can tolerate)
|
Forever I will never understand the conflation of "free speech" with "speech without consequences" that conservatives love SO much.
The "free speech" portion of this discussion ended when Cathy said what he said. That's what free speech is -- his right to say what he did.
Not his right to avoid a boycott, be called out for his views, or lose business over it if that's what happened. That's not an issue of free speech -- ironically enough, it's an issue of a free market economy and people wanting go vote with their dollars. But when it comes to hating gays, all logic goes out the window.
This is hardly an issue of free speech. Nobody censored Cathy or denied him his right to say what he did. That's the only portion of this that had anything to do with "free speech" and the First Amendment, and the First Amendment worked just fine in this case.
Same thing happened with the Mormon lady in Cali whose restaurant got boycotted after it was found out that she donated to the effort to repeal gay marriage in California. All the gay-hating conservatives got all worked up about her right to free speech, pretending that her restaurant being boycotted for what she said and did had ANYTHING at all to do with the First Amendment.
What a bunch of disingenuous hacks.