Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bababooyee
Well, since we're honestly trying to communicate, let me explain what I meant by "I could argue the same thing in reverse" wrt the above.
But, let me make sure I am understanding the above properly. Are you saying:
Assuming for the sake of argument that life begins at conception, a law forcing a woman to carry her rapist's baby to term makes some lives more important than others (ie a hierarchy to human life).
|
i understand that part. i understand that my logic in that section was flawed, because by aborting the baby in order to spare her the trauma, it's still 1 for 1. either way, one person is going to be screwed. i get that, and understood your ability to argue that one.