Quote:
Originally Posted by Clip-Clop
THE ABOVE NAMED COMPLAINING WITNESS BEENG DULY SWORN, ON ENFORMATION
AND BELIEF STATES THAT:
COUNT 1: THEFT (EMBEZZLEMENT) (VALUE EXCEEDING $10,000)
The above-named defendant between 2006 and 2009, at 3949 East Mallory Ave., in the City of
Cudahy, and other locations within Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as trustee, having
possession of money of the Military Order of Purple Heart, Inc., Michelle Witmer Chapter 96,
having a value exceeding $10,000, did use such money without the owner's consent, contrary to
the defendant's authority, and with intent to convert said property to his own use or to the use of
any other person except the owner, contrary to sec. 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c), 971 336(3)
Copied and pasted.
|
Then you are far smarter than me, as I still cannot copy and paste from the document.
Once again:
Riot said that it turns out
Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof".
Riot
provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.
So: now it's up to you and Wiphan: What part of the Journal-Sentinel article saying Scott Walker lied, and the court documents supporting it, do you think are not true? What part is the Journal-Sentinal lying about? And please provide the proof.