Quote:
Originally Posted by pointman
|
Yes - those people could be called union "thugs", during that action, couldn't they?
But what does that have to do with non-violent Wisconsin teachers, firefighters and police men?
Nothing.
I suppose the point that I was making, that unions are no longer rooted in violence and intimidation, was simply too nuanced for you to grasp? Or, because one union in one action in 2011 was violent, you want to use that to disprove the simple truth that unions today are not violent?