Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb
Where did I say I was for government intervention?
I am against the government intervention that continues to keep the massacre of babies in utero legal.Had the Supreme Court not acted in 1973, the deadlock in the case would have prevented the killing of that human being, and of course the erroneous precedent that one parent alone can order the execution of her would-be child would never have been established.
The fathers aren't off the hook either. It's wrong to set up that situation and then be nowhere to be found. Everybody should learn a little self control instead of acting mentally like children, who then don't want children.
Find a dictionary printed prior to 1973 and you may find a word : aborticide.
|
it removed government intervention, but nice try. and i'm figuring you're also in favor of the all the limits placed by govt since then (waiting limits, ultrasounds, etc)-you never answered the question i asked, which tells me all i need to know.