Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Balletto
I flat out stated in the other Bernardini post that at no point in the future will he be as valuable as he is right now. They would, more than likely, diminish his value to them by racing them next year. Absolutely.
But on the same hand, you nor me, know whats going on with the animal. It more than likely is an economic decision... and im fine with that. I'd do what they're doing and run all the way to the bank... but there may be more than whats being said. Having had parents who owned a racing stable, I know there's almost always little things nagging runners... some worse than others... some just a matter of time before they get serious.
This may be one of those situations, it may not. But im not going to assume anything and fault owners for behaving exactly how I would. 406 million were spent at public auction by the sheiks... im sure they'd like to get some of that back... and im sure, above all else, nothing will be as thrilling for them as racing homebreds by him.
|
Supposedly they were the ones that didn't have to make selfish financially based decisions. They were the ones with so much money that they could do what was best for the game and not themselves. Apparently, when push comes to shove, they are as selfish as anyone. I understand why people who need the money do it. They don't need the money....that's for sure. If they cared at all about what was good for the game they would be racing Bernardini next year. At least this issue has been settled once and for all. Sportsmen they are not.
Please, spare me the " problems nagging horses " lesson. I think we all know that horses have nagging problems. I think we also knew that this particular decision was made a while ago and it is a financial one. Once again, let's stop pretending to care about the welfare of horses to the detriment of the game...unless you're just ready to go completely pro-Peta.