Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I'd have better luck remembering that you cannot jump from one idea to a logical second, but have to go step-by-step without skipping.
 That makes zero logical sense whatsoever. There is zero connection between your conclusion and your first sentence. Zero.
That makes zero sense, and you clearly have no concept of how lasix actually works in the horse. Your assumptions in the above paragraph are legion and many.
Please: leave science to the scientists. You have to decide, are you going to listen to them, or not? Because right now you've clearly chosen "not". And you are making a hodgepodge of ridiculous arguments taking a snatch of concept from here and there (you are not ridiculous, friend, the arguments are logically ridiculous) |
It makes zero sense if you can't read, otherwise I'm sure most can figure it out.
I'll ask some easy questions. If you can answer, great. If you won't, don't bother responding.
- Do you think most horses that race in Europe suffer from EIPH when racing?
- Do episodes of EIPH cause any long term damage?
- If so, shouldn't the horses get worse the more they race?
- If not, what is the harm in waiting to see if a horse actually bleeds before administering Lasix?