Quote:
Originally Posted by RolloTomasi
The issue at hand, since clearly you don't follow, is the significance of bleeding, not the diagnosis.
Ketchup.
|
Oh, I love it when those ignorant of science try to use it in an argument, then reveal themselves to be ... well, ignorant of science.
Yes, the issue at hand is the significance of bleeding. And to know if a horse has bleed, you have to ... you know ...
see if it bled, first. Then you measure the change in performance.
Right?
Your question was: "How much is a horse's performance actually affected by bleeding at grades below the most severe?"
We
have that information. Do you know the answer?
Let's base the use of lasix in race horses on the
facts surrounding lasix in race horses. Don't you agree? Let's let the
facts tell us what we should do for the horses in our care?
Rather than making up scientific-sounding nonsense, or ignoring the 127 papers published about lasix in race horses, pretending the information we don't want to hear just doesn't exist?